6.1 Implications arising from significance
The Commonwealth statement of significance (section 5.1 above) demonstrates North Reef Lighthouse is a place of considerable heritage value due to its association with lighthouse development in Queensland, its rare location on a coral reef, and its formation of the tower with water tank and keepers quarters at its base.
The implication arising from this assessment is that key aspects of the place should be conserved to retain this significance. The key features requiring conservation include:
- architectural quality of the building
- interior spaces and features, which are notable for their design, details and/or their original lighthouse function. These include:
- lantern room including catwalk
- pedestal
- intermediate floors
- tower stairs
- ground floor
- external spaces and features, which are notable for their design, details, and/or their original lighthouse function. These include:
- lantern roof
- lantern glazing
- tower walls
- balcony, including balustrades
- windows and doors
- ground floor roof
- ground floor walls
- iron caisson
Referral and approvals of action
The EPBC Act requires approval from the Minister for the Environment for all actions likely to have a significant impact on matters of National Environmental Significance (NES).
The Act provides that actions taken:
- on Commonwealth land which are likely to have a significant impact on the environment will require approval of the Minister.
- outside Commonwealth land which are likely to have a significant impact on the environment on Commonwealth land will require approval of the Minister.
- by the Australian Government or its agencies which are likely to have a significant impact on the environment anywhere will require approval of the Minister.
The definition of ‘environment’ in the EPBC Act includes the cultural heritage values of places.
Heritage strategy
If an Australian Government agency owns or controls one or more places with Commonwealth heritage values, it must prepare a heritage strategy within two years from the first time they own or control a heritage place (section 341ZA).
A heritage strategy is a written document that integrates heritage conservation and management within an agency’s overall property planning and management framework. Its purpose is to help an agency manage and report on the steps it has taken to protect and conserve the commonwealth heritage values of the properties under its ownership or control. The latest heritage strategy for AMSA’s AtoN assets was completed and approved by the Commonwealth Minister for the Environment in 2022 and is available online."36
Heritage asset condition report
A heritage asset condition report is a written document that details the heritage fabric of a site with an in-depth description of each architectural and structural element. The document includes: a brief history of the site, the Commonwealth Heritage statement of significance and value criteria, a heritage significance rating for each individual element, and a catalogue of artefacts on-site. The document is also accompanied by up-to-date photos of each structural element. This document operates as a tool for heritage monitoring, and is reviewed and updated biennially.
Natural and Aboriginal heritage values
North Reef and the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park as a whole are notable for their Aboriginal cultural and natural heritage values. The potential remains for future works at the lighthouse to impact these values. At the time this plan was written, no plans have been made for future works at North Reef Lighthouse. In the event major works at the lighthouse are to be carried out, AMSA will seek to minimise impacts to the surrounding area by:
- Abiding by any relevant environment management plans for the marine park
- Ensuring no damage is made to surrounding vegetation or animal habitats
- Ensuring project footprint is limited to the AMSA lease. In any instance that work is required outside of this footprint, approvals will be sought from the appropriate stakeholders.
- Implementing an appropriate discovery plan in the instance Aboriginal cultural heritage is suspected and/or found.
6.2 Framework: sensitivity to change
Owing to the site’s association with Queensland’s maritime history, its rarity as a lighthouse tower complete with residences built atop a coral reef, and its unique technical achievement due to the water tank at its base, North Reef Lighthouse is of high significance. Therefore, work actioned by AMSA on the lighthouse’s fabric harnesses the potential to reduce or eradicate the significance of the site’s heritage values.
Conservation works, including restoration and reconstruction, or adaption works of the absolute minimum so as to continue the lighthouse’s usefulness as an AtoN are the only works that should be actioned by AMSA on North Reef Lighthouse. Some exceptions are made for health and safety requirements, however any and all work carried out must be conducted in line with heritage considerations and requirements of the EPBC Act.
The table below demonstrates the level of sensitivity attributed to the various elements of the fabric register in the face of change. These are measured from high to low depending on the action’s possible threat to the site’s heritage values.
High sensitivity
High sensitivity to change includes instances wherein a change would pose a major threat to the heritage value of a specific fabric, or the lightstation as a whole. A major threat is one that would lead to substantial or total loss of the heritage value.
Moderate sensitivity
Moderate sensitivity to change includes instances wherein a change would pose a moderate threat to the heritage value of a specific fabric, or to the heritage significance of a specific fabric in another part of the building. A moderate threat is one that would diminish the heritage value, or diminish the ability of an observer to appreciate the value.
Low sensitivity
Low sensitivity to change includes instances wherein a change would pose little to no threat to the heritage value of a specific fabric, or to the heritage significance in another part of the building.
Component | Level of sensitivity | |
North Reef Lighthouse structure | High |
|
Low |
| |
Ground floor | High |
|
Low |
| |
Intermediate floors | High |
|
Low |
| |
Stairs and weight tube | High |
|
Low |
| |
Lantern house | High |
|
Medium |
| |
Low |
| |
Balcony and balustrades | High |
|
Medium |
| |
Low |
| |
Lantern glazing | High |
|
Low |
| |
Lantern roof | High |
|
Low |
| |
Lens assembly and light source | Low |
|
Pedestal | High |
|
Low |
| |
Tower walls | High |
|
Low |
| |
Windows | High |
|
Low |
| |
Doors | High |
|
Low |
| |
Ground floor walls and roof | High |
|
Low |
| |
Iron Caisson | High |
|
Low |
|
6.3 Statutory and legislative requirements
The following table lists the Acts and codes relevant to the management of North Reef Lighthouse.
Act or code | Description |
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) | The Environment Protection & Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) requires agencies to prepare management plans that satisfy the obligations included in Schedule 7A and 7B of the EPBC Regulations. |
Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Regulations 2000 (Cth) Schedule 7B | The Commonwealth Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment has determined these principles as essential for guidance in managing heritage properties.
(a) have a particular interest in, or associations with, the place; and (b) may be affected by the management of the place;
|
AMSA Heritage Strategy 2018 | As the custodian of many iconic sites, AMSA has long recognised the importance of preserving their cultural heritage. This Heritage Strategy is in response to section 341ZA of the EPBC Regulations (2000) which obliges AMSA to prepare and maintain a heritage strategy, along with obliging AMSA to:
The strategy derives from the AMSA Corporate Plan and achievements are reported through the AMSA Annual Report. The 2018-19 AMSA Annual Report can be found online.37 |
Navigation Act 2012 (Cth) | Part 5 of the Act outlines AMSA’s power to establish, maintain and inspect marine aids to navigation (such as North Reef Lighthouse).
|
Australian Heritage Council Act 2003 (Cth) | This Act establishes the Australian Heritage Council, whose functions are:
|
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 (Cth)
| [The following was provided by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.38] Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Act 1975 is the primary Act and includes provisions which:
|
Building Code of Australia | The Code is the definitive regulatory resource for building construction, providing a nationally accepted and uniform approach to technical requirements for the building industry. It specifies matters relating to building work in order to achieve a range of health and safety objectives, including fire safety. As far as possible, Commonwealth agencies aim to achieve compliance with the Code, although this may not be entirely possible because of the nature of and constraints provided by existing circumstances, such as an existing building. |
Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (Cth) | The objectives of this Act include:
[Quoted from Division 2 of Act] This has implications for North Reef Lighthouse of Australia as it is related to AMSA staff, contractors and visitors. |
6.4 Operational requirements and occupier needs
As a working AtoN, the operational needs of North Reef Lighthouse are primarily concerned with navigational requirements. Below are the operational details and requirements of the North Reef light as outlined by AMSA.
NAVIGATIONAL REQUIREMENT FOR AMSA’S ATON SITE
1 | Objective/rationale | An AtoN is required on North Reef to mark the reef at the Northern end of the Capricorn Group. It is a navigation mark for vessels in a very complex area of North / South two way routes, GBR marine park, marine reserve, area to be avoided and designated shipping area. In particular a South West / North East two-way route connecting with the Port of Gladstone lies between 3 and 6 nautical miles North West of the AtoN. |
2 | Required type(s) of AtoN | A fixed structure is required to act as a daymark. A distinctive light is required for use at night. |
3 | Priority/significance | An AtoN at this site is critical for the navigation of commercial ships. |
4 | Required measure of performance | The service performance of the AtoN must comply with the IALA Availability Target Category 1 (99.8%). Target availability for AIS is 99.8%. |
5 | Primary and secondary means (if any) of identification | The daymark must be conspicuous. The existing 24 metre white round metal tower and red cupola at an elevation of 23 metres meets this requirement. The light must comply with the requirements of rhythmic characters of light as per the IALA NAVGUIDE. The light must have distinct characteristics that are easy to recognise and identify. The present flashing (2) white light every 15 seconds meets this requirement. |
6 | Visual range | During daytime, the AtoN structure should be visible from at least 5 nautical miles. At night, the white light must have a nominal range of at least 17 nautical miles. |
7 | Radar conspicuousness | As the AtoN has a RACON, no additional radar enhancement is required for this site. |
AMSA’s goals
AMSA is responsible, under the Navigation Act, for maintaining a network of marine AtoN around Australia’s coastline that assist mariners to make safe and efficient passages. AMSA’s present network of approximately 500 marine AtoN includes traditional lighthouses such as North Reef, beacons, buoys, racons, automatic identification system stations, metocean sensors including broadcasting tide gauges, current meter, directional wave rider buoys and a weather station.
Technological developments in the area of vessel traffic management have also contributed to increasing navigation safety and helped promote marine environment protection. AMSA aims to meet international standards for the reliability of lighthouses set by the International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities (IALA).
At the time of preparing this management plan, the major goal for North Reef Lighthouse primarily encompassed continuing its utilisation as an AtoN (for as long as necessary), while upkeeping the appropriate maintenance to conserve and preserve the heritage values of the lightstation.
Lighthouse performance standards
AMSA aims to meet international standards for the reliability of lighthouses set by IALA. North Reef light is designated as an IALA Availability Category 1 AtoN (within a scale of Category 1 to Category 3, Category 1 aids are most critical). Category 1 aids have an availability target of 99.8 per cent.
Access to the lighthouse
One practical effect of this performance standard is that the operational equipment and structure of the light need to be kept in good repair by regular maintenance. Routine maintenance and emergency repairs are carried out by AMSA’s maintenance contractor. The contractor needs reliable access to the site for this work, and AMSA officers need access for occasional inspections of the site including to audit the contractor’s performance.
6.5 Proposals for change
Preventative maintenance works are carried out on the lighthouse to maintain its status as a working marine AtoN, and to assist in the site’s conservation.
A list of scheduled preventative maintenance work is identified within the latest available site inspection report. The information provided below was taken from this report.
Maintenance | Estimated date of work |
Lantern room paint | 2024 |
Reseal lantern glazing | 2024 |
6.6 Potential pressures
A significant pressure that harnesses the potential to affect the Commonwealth heritage values of the place would be the obligation to remove or replace original fabric materials from the lightstation owing to unavoidable and irreversible deterioration. At the time this plan was written, no current plans exist to remove or replace any original fabric materials from North Reef Lighthouse. In the event plans are made to modify or remove original fabric, work will be conducted in line with the heritage considerations and requirements of the EPBC Act.
6.7 Processes for decision-making
Processes for decision-making are required in the event of an incident that impacts the heritage values of the site. The following incidents are included due to their likelihood of occurrence at North Reef Lighthouse.
Incident | Procedure |
Major project/maintenance works proposed |
|
Damage to lighthouse’s fabric (heritage significance) |
|
Damage to lighthouse’s fabric (no heritage significance) |
|
Light upgrade |
|
Modification to lighthouse such as adding of attachment |
|
Unforeseen discovery of Aboriginal cultural heritage on-site. |
|
Divestment of lighthouse from AMSA |
|
________________________________________________________________________________